Believing in "Bad Vibes"

When she leaves, will the negativity linger behind? Image: iStock/Deborah Cheramie

Imagine that your co-worker has just moved into a new office. The woman who used to work there spent many unhappy months in the office complaining about her job. In fact, she ended up quitting in a fit of rage. Upon moving into the office, your co-worker tells you that she senses some ?bad energy? leftover from the previous employee. Would you believe her? Or would you think she?s a tad crazy?

Or imagine instead that you?re choosing between two apartments. They are identical with one exception: you happen to know that the former tenant in one of the apartments was an extremely happy, joyful person. Would you be more inclined to choose that apartment, based on an expectation that you might experience some lingering good feelings?

Your answers reflect how much you believe in ?emotional residue,? which is the idea that emotions can hang around a physical environment, long after their owners have left. New research suggests that at a gut level, most of us believe that emotional residue exists. However, the culture we?ve grown up in determines the extent to which we consciously and openly endorse those beliefs.

Krishna Savani of Columbia University, along with his colleagues, ran several identical studies using both American and Indian participants. In an initial study, he asked participants whether it?s possible for emotions to travel outside of the human body. Many of the Indian participants agreed with this possibility, while most Americans disagreed with it. However, when Savani measured people?s beliefs in more subtle ways, he found that both Americans and Indians seem to believe strongly in emotional residue.

He had participants from both countries read scenarios about David, a college freshman who moves into a new dorm room. The previous student who lived in the room was described as having spent a lot of time there feeling either very happy or depressed. Savani asked his participants to predict how David would feel a couple of weeks after living in his new room. Both Indians and Americans predicted that David would feel similarly to the student who had lived there before. In other words, he?d feel happy if the previous student had been happy and sad if the previous student had been sad.

Using a different scenario, Savani looked at people?s beliefs about how emotional residue influences other people?s behavior. He had participants read about Margaret who sublets an apartment from a woman named Alice. Unbeknownst to Margaret, Alice spent the last couple of months in the apartment feeling very sad, due to problems she was having with her boyfriend. Margaret moves into the empty apartment and immediately begins feeling very happy. Savani asked his participants, ?To what extent do you think Margaret?s behavior is surprising?? Both Americans and Indians said they found Margaret?s behavior surprising. They expected her to feel sad after moving into a space that had witnessed so much recent sadness.

In a final study, Savani looked at whether beliefs in emotional residue influence people?s actual behavior. He ran an experiment where he gave people a choice of two different rooms in which to fill out a survey. The sign on the door of one room indicated that the previous occupants had spent the past two hours recalling happy life events. The sign on the other door indicated that the previous occupants had spent the last couple of hours remembering unhappy life events. He then made note of which room the participants chose to enter. Savani found that the majority of both Americans and Indians chose to fill out their surveys in the room where they thought people had previously spent time recalling happy memories.

Source: http://rss.sciam.com/click.phdo?i=f7273c653cd25203271145f9c3644b3c

jeffrey eugenides jeffrey eugenides volcker rule matthew stafford rosie o donnell brady quinn brady quinn